There are many disagreements in the body of Christ. That’s nothing new, Paul and Barnabas had sharp contention between them and parted ways over it – even in the early days of Christianity (Acts 15:39).
I come from a Christian family where we have staunch Catholics, evangelical Pentecostals, Baptists, and seeming agnostics throughout my siblings. Maybe that’s why I question everything.
But, in my opintion, nothing is so divisive as the subject of the Trinity. In case you haven’t heard or seen the (extensive) videos, there are actual 2-3 hour debates on whether or not there is a Trinity (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit – three ‘persons’ in one). Those who oppose say that the Holy Spirit is simply an extension of the Father and not a separate being.
I was raised Catholic so of course, by tradition, I had the proclivity to be a believer in the concept of a Trinity. And I realize this is a touchy subject because to either side it seems to be a very foundation of belief – so don’t upset the proverbial apple cart.
But, like I said, I question everything. It is belief…When we are first converted, we have a belief in God based on our upbringing and/or what we have heard. Are we condemned because we are believing wrongly? No, we are not.
But once we come to knowledge(s) of the truth, we have to cast aside the errors of our thinking and go on, in faith, to even deeper knowledge(s) of the truth.
However, it is not so on this subject – for me, anyway. I go back and forth like a pendulum in a grandfather clock. This is due to my insistent nature of digging into theologies and opinions and really trying to see both sides of the argument. And I want to know the truth.
Is this being tossed back and forth by the winds of doctrine? I don’t think it is because, #1 – I am not doubting my belief in God, and #2 – this is not a doctrine but a core belief in Whom we are communicating with on our very path to heaven’s gates.
Some may be thinking, “Don’t even bring it up then if it is so divisive..” and I would agree, except that I believe we can come to a better understanding of our Creator and His functions if we look at the Word closely – and then hopefully come to a settled knowing of what we believe. God will honor that. I know He will.
But if you are fine with your understanding of the Trinity and their functions, I’m happy for you. We all (or most of us) know the traditional thought: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are three different ‘entities’ (for lack of a better word) operating as One.
5 Who is he that overcomes the world, but he that believes that Jesus is the Son of God?
6 This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that bears witness, because the Spirit is truth.
7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one. (1 John 5)
Why can’t everything be this simple? But is it?
Vine’s Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words says “one” (Strong’s G1520 in verse 7 and 8) has 2 meanings. The first meaning is “one” as in the number, “in contrast to many”. The second meaning is metaphorically “union” and “concord”. They are united in agreement, per se.
Now here’s the interesting part: A respected biblical scholar (I can’t remember who) stated that the “are one” of verse 7 was added later into the margin of the manuscript and thus put into scripture; however, verse 8 “agree in one” was always there. I don’t know if that is the absolute truth but that was what his research revealed.
What IS interesting about this is that Vine’s does not even list the “are one” as being in verse 7 (along with all of the uses of “one” G1520 in the New Testament) but it does give a definition for verse 8, saying “and the three are into one,” i.e., united in “one” and the same witness.
Witnesses attest to a fact. The fact, contextually speaking, is referring back to verse 6 – which is the Spirit bearing witness. Could “these three are one” have been added by someone later? Who knows.
I’ll leave it here, but that’s not the final thought on this subject. It’s too important.